LudomagLudomagLudomag
  • ALL SECTIONS
    • TOOLS & RESOURCES
    • EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS
    • TEACHING METHODS
    • SEARCH & POINTS OF VIEW
  • REPORTS & INTERVIEWS
  • BOOKMARKS
  • LANGUAGES
    • FR
    • ES
Search
  • Advertise
© 2023 ludomag.com édité et géré par WOOMEET SAS, powered by Wordpress.
Reading: At Ludoviales, Serge Tisseron warns: “AI is an uncomfortable social actor”
Share
Sign In
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
LudomagLudomag
Font ResizerAa
  • Business
  • Technology
Search
  • Home
    • Home 1
  • Categories
    • Technology
    • Business
  • Bookmarks
  • More Foxiz
    • Sitemap
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2023 ludomag.com édité et géré par WOOMEET SAS, powered by Wordpress.
Ludomag > Blog > SEARCH & VIEWPOINT > Point of view > At Ludoviales, Serge Tisseron warns: “AI is an uncomfortable social actor”
Point of view

At Ludoviales, Serge Tisseron warns: “AI is an uncomfortable social actor”

LUDOVIALES 2026 🎥 – During the conference held on Wednesday, March 18 as part of Ludoviales, Serge Tisserondelivered a deep and nuanced analysis of artificial intelligence, which he describes as an “uncomfortable social actor.” His talk goes beyond technical aspects to question our psychological, social, and educational relationship with these technologies.

Eric Fourcaud
Last updated: 2026-04-24 6:20 PM
Eric Fourcaud
Published: 2026-04-24
35 Views
5 Min Read
Screenshot
SHARE

LUDOVIALES 2026 🎥 – During the conference held on Wednesday, March 18 as part of Ludoviales, Serge Tisserondelivered a deep and nuanced analysis of artificial intelligence, which he describes as an “uncomfortable social actor.” His talk goes beyond technical aspects to question our psychological, social, and educational relationship with these technologies.

A technology at the crossroads of two visions

From the outset, the psychiatrist reminds us that AI is not a uniform invention, but the result of two historical visions: that of John McCarthy, who saw it as a “universal problem solver,” and that of Alan Turing, for whom a machine is intelligent when it can pass as a human being.

Today, the meeting of these two definitions leads us to consider artificial intelligence as the equivalent of an extraordinary human being,” he explains.

This shift in perspective is not without consequences—especially in education, where AI is sometimes perceived as an authority figure.

An illusion of superiority… and a misleading one

For Serge Tisseron, one of the main risks lies in the illusion of competence created by these tools.

AI often gives us the impression that we are idiots,” he notes, highlighting their ability to produce complex and unexpected responses.

But this apparent intelligence hides a very different reality:

The way artificial intelligence works […] can produce statements that are logical, poetic, or completely absurd.”

Between biases, hallucinations, and unverified data, AI remains fundamentally imperfect—despite its apparent fluency.

Very real risks: bias, manipulation, and dependency

The researcher stresses the concrete dangers associated with AI, both technological and economic. These include:

  • algorithmic bias, sometimes with serious consequences (especially in healthcare)
  • the spread of misinformation
  • user manipulation
  • psychological dependency

He also points to a troubling phenomenon: many people seek in AI a kind of maternal substitute.

This emotional relationship can evolve into dependency, reinforced by systems designed to please users and capture their attention.

Anthropomorphism: key to our relationship with AI

At the heart of his analysis, Serge Tisseron highlights a fundamental psychological mechanism: anthropomorphism.

Humans tend to attribute human characteristics to machines,” he reminds us.

This phenomenon—already observed in the 1960s with the ELIZA program—helps explain why users trust systems that are, in reality, fallible.

Today, however, this tendency is amplified by design choices:

There is […] a deceptive anthropomorphism created by AI designers to keep us hooked.”

Not a tool, but a colleague

In response, the psychiatrist proposes a radical shift in perspective:

We must learn to treat AI as colleagues rather than tools.”

Why? Because unlike a traditional tool, AI is neither fully reliable nor predictable. It contains biases, errors, and its own internal logic.

Seeing it as a “colleague” would encourage a more critical stance—based on vigilance, dialogue, and distance.

A major educational challenge

Underlying his talk is a key question for education: how should we train students to interact intelligently with these systems?

Caught between fascination and mistrust, Serge Tisseron calls for collective awareness:

We cannot use AI as a simple tool […] because it is full of errors.”

A strong message at a time when AI is becoming increasingly integrated into teaching practices.

A deeply human reflection on AI

At Ludoviales, this talk stood out for its deeply human perspective on artificial intelligence. Far from techno-optimistic or alarmist narratives, Serge Tisseron invites us to rethink our relationship with these technologies: neither neutral tools nor intelligent beings, but ambiguous partners with whom we must learn to coexist.

About Serge Tisseron

Psychiatrist, PhD in psychology (HDR), member of the Academy of Technologies, creator of the 3-6-9-12 guidelines, the “Three Figures Game,” the Institute for the Study of Human-Robot Relationships (IERHR), and the Institute for the History and Memory of Catastrophes (IHMEC). He is also co-director of the University Diploma in Cyberpsychology at Université Paris Cité.

Recent publications:

  • Empathy (PUF)
  • Anger and Mourning: From an Intimate Emotion to Its Social Expression (Albin Michel)
  • Should Social Media Be Banned for Young People? (Laffont)

Upcoming (April 2): Maternal Machines

Website: https://sergetisseron.com

You Might Also Like

Have You Ever Thought About It? Developing Critical Thinking in Class with Generative Artificial Intelligence
How ChatGPT Changes Student Evaluation
Video Game Supervision: A Societal Challenge?
Facing ChatGPT, learning to learn with the « Ignorant Master » method
UNESCO Releases the Artificial Intelligence Competency Framework for Teachers
TAGGED:AIpsychology
Share This Article
Facebook Whatsapp Whatsapp LinkedIn Copy Link
ByEric Fourcaud
Follow:
Since its inception in 2006, he has been the Director of Publication, specializing in the educational digital sector and Edtech, an area he has been involved in for over two decades. He is tasked with organizing, moderating roundtable discussions, conducting interviews, and hosting conferences on these topics. For three seasons, he has been hosting podcasts for LUDOMAG. Additionally, he is responsible for development and partnerships.
Previous Article Artificial intelligence in education: between spectacular promises and necessary caution
Next Article Internationally, French schools between influence and adaptation
Aucun commentaire Aucun commentaire

Laisser un commentaire Annuler la réponse

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Follow us

  • bluesky
  • linkedin
  • facebook
  • instagram
  • youtube

PODCAST LUDOMAG

pub
pub

First online magazine for sharing teachers’ experiences on their teaching practices in the classroom with digital technology.

ABOUT US

About us
Newsletter
Contact us

LEGAL INFORMATIONS

Cookie
Privacy policy
Legal notice

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Follow US
© 2005-2026 ludomag.com edited and managed by WOOMEET SAS, powered by Wordpress.
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..

Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Formulaire de connexion protégé par WP Captcha